Salesforce AP-215 Actual Free Exam Questions & Community Discussion

Your client would like to create a new harmonization field - Exam Topic.
The below table represents the harmonization logic from each source.

As can be seen from the table there are in fact two fields that hold a certain connection: Exam ID and Exam Topic. The connection indicates that where an Exam ID is found -a single Exam Topic value is associated with it.
The Client has a requirement to be able to view measurements from all data sources sliced by Exam Topic values as seen in the following example:

Which harmonization feature should an Implementation engineer use to meet the client's requirement?

A client's data consists of three data sources - Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads and Google Campaign Manager.
Notes:
* The client is planning on adding an additional 100 Facebook Ads data streams and 50 more LinkedIn Ads data streams.
* The final volume of data in the workspace will be 5M rows
* Each data source has a naming convention and it can be assumed that any additional profile (i.e. Data Stream) from one of these sources will follow the same naming convention.
The client provided the following sample files:
Facebook Ads:


The client would like to create a new harmonization field named "Market," which will only be coming from Facebook Ads and LinkedIn Ads. The logic for
"Market" is the following:
IF Media Buy Type is equal to "TypeB" or "TypeC" or "TypeD"
Return 'Europe'
ELSE
Return 'Rest Of The World'
In order to create the harmonization field Market, the client considers using either Mapping Formula, Calculated Dimension, VLOOKUP or Patterns.
Considering maintenance and scalability, which option is recommended?

An implementation engineer has been asked to perform QA for a standard file ingestion, done by the client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:

The number of rows added to this data stream is 3. What could have led to this discrepancy?

A client created a new KPI: CPS (Cost per Sign-up).
The new KIP is mapped within the data stream mapping, and is populated with the following logic: (Media Cost) / Sign-ups) As can be seen in the table below, CPS was created twice and was set with two different aggregations:

From looking at the table, what are the aggregation settings for each one of the newly created KPIs?

Your client is interested in ingesting the below file:

The client decided to upload the file to a new generic data stream type and map 'Date' to 'Day' and 'Number of Topics' to a generic custom metric.
In regards to the fields 'Meeting Code' and 'Meeting Name', your client is debating several options.
Which two options would you recommend in order to avoid data loss?

Which two statements are correct regarding the Parent-Child configuration?

A client's data consists of three data streams as follows:
Data Stream A:

* The data streams should be linked together through a parent-child relationship.
* Out of the three data streams, Data Stream C is considered the source of truth for both the dimensions and measurements.
Assuming the data was ingested properly and the Parent Child was created correctly according to the client's requirements, what is the total Impressions value for Campaign Key 'CK_3'?