Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Actual Free Exam Questions & Community Discussion

Refer to the exhibit. An organization needs to enable access to their customer data from both a mobile app and a web application, which each need access to common fields as well as certain unique fields.
The data is available partially in a database and partially in a 3rd-party CRM system.
What APIs should be created to best fit these design requirements?

A) A Process API that contains the data required by both the web and mobile apps, allowing these applications to invoke it directly and access the data they need thereby providing the flexibility to add more fields in the future without needing API changes B) One set of APIs (Experience API, Process API, and System API) for the web app, and another set for the mobile app C) Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system

D) A common Experience API used by both the web and mobile apps, but separate Process APIs for the web and mobile apps that interact with the database and the CRM System

Which component monitors APIs and endpoints at scheduled intervals, receives reports about whether tests pass or fail, and displays statistics about API and endpoint performance?

A large lending company has developed an API to unlock data from a database server and web server. The API has been deployed to Anypoint Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) on CloudHub 1.0.
The database server and web server are in the customer's secure network and are not accessible through the public internet. The database server is in the customer's AWS VPC, whereas the web server is in the customer's on-premises corporate data center.
How can access be enabled for the API to connect with the database server and the web server?

When could the API data model of a System API reasonably mimic the data model exposed by the corresponding backend system, with minimal improvements over the backend system's data model?

An API has been updated in Anypoint exchange by its API producer from version 3.1.1 to 3.2.0 following accepted semantic versioning practices and the changes have been communicated via the APIs public portal. The API endpoint does NOT change in the new version. How should the developer of an API client respond to this change?

Mule applications that implement a number of REST APIs are deployed to their own subnet that is inaccessible from outside the organization.
External business-partners need to access these APIs, which are only allowed to be invoked from a separate subnet dedicated to partners - called Partner-subnet. This subnet is accessible from the public internet, which allows these external partners to reach it.
Anypoint Platform and Mule runtimes are already deployed in Partner-subnet. These Mule runtimes can already access the APIs.
What is the most resource-efficient solution to comply with these requirements, while having the least impact on other applications that are currently using the APIs?

To minimize operation costs, a customer wants to use a CloudHub 1.0 solution. The customer's requirements are:
* Separate resources with two Business groups
* High-availability (HA) for all APIs
* Route traffic via Dedicated load balancer (DLBs)
* Separate environments into production and non-production
Which solution meets the customer's needs?

The implementation of a Process API must change.
What is a valid approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients?