EXIN SIAMP Actual Free Exam Questions & Community Discussion

The CEO has asked SIAMRUS to assist in the Discovery and Strategy stage. Given this stage, SIAMRUS is not appointed as the service integrator yet. The first task assigned to SIAMRUS is to analyze the current ZYX services and service providers.
OUTSCO has refused to provide any information to SIAMRUS because they are a competitor SIAMRUS still needs information to create a baseline assessment What is the best approach for SIAMRUS to get the necessary information about OUTSCO and its services'?

ZYXS has been chosen as the service integrator. Immediately after implementation an issue has arisen with a high priority incident. OUTSCO and ZYXD are passing the incident between them and are blaming each other for not owning the solution. Meanwhile the incident is approaching its target resolution time and may breach its service level What should ZYXS do first?

The outline SIAM model has been determined.
-SIAMRUS will be the service integrator.
-The development teams from ZYXS and ZYXUK will merge to provide global application development and support services
-ZYXS will also provide a centralized service desk, desktop support, and field engineer support.
-OUTSCO will provide hosting e-mail services, the wide area network, and local area networks under new contracts
-All services currently hosted by ZYXS or ZYXD will transfer to OUTSCO
The strategy is to transfer the current services to these named service providers as the legacy contracts expire The merger with the Tokyo-based competitor has started and is expected to complete in 3 months' time. As part of the merger the services currently provided by the Tokyo-based internal functions will transfer to ZYXS and ZYXUK. The planning for this has only just started, there is insufficient time to create and test a detailed plan What is the most appropriate implementation approach for the ZYX SIAM model?
What is the most appropriate implementation approach for the ZYX SIAM model?

ZYX has decided to appoint ZYXS as service integrator using the lead supplier structure ZYXS will need to fill new roles with additional skilled resources The contract with OUTSCO will be terminated, and all the component services will be transitioned to FIELD$CO: MAILSCO. NETSCO. ZYXD and ZYXS The SIAM Project Board has just agreed that after the transition there will no longer be a requirement for service delivery managers in ZYXUK to manage the outsourced contract with OUTSCO What is the best way to deal with this situation?

What is unlikely to be included in the outline business case for NEWGEN?

The ZYXS IT Director has proposed to the CIO that ZYXS should be the service integrator in the new SIAM model. The CIO wants to validate if the necessary capabilities exist in ZYXS. The CIO has asked SIAMRUS to perform the assessment.
What is the first activity that SIAMRUS should carry out?