Salesforce Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence Actual Free Exam Questions & Community Discussion

An implementation engineer has been provided with 4 different source files: 03m 48s
1. Twitter Ads ~
2. Creative Classification
3. Placement Classification
4, Campaign Category Classification
The main source is Twitter Ads (which includes various fields and KPIs), and the rest are classification files that connect to Twitter Ads and enrich different fields within it.
The connections between the files are described as follows:
1st Party Creative Classification
File structure/headers:

Creative ID - links back to Creative Key (Twitter Ads)
1st Party Placement Classification by
File structure/headers:

Your client provided the following sources:
Source 1:

Source 2:

Source 3:

As can be seen, the Product values present in sources 2 and 3 are similar and can be linked with the first extraction from 'Media Buy Name' in source1 The end goal is to achieve a final view of Product Group alongside Clicks and Sign Ups, as described below:

Which two options will meet the client's requirement and enable the desired view?

What are two potential reasons for performance issues (when loading a dashboard) when using the CRM data stream type?

Which two statements are correct regarding the Parent-Child configuration?

A client has integrated data from Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, and Google Ads in Marketing Cloud Intelligence. For each data source, the data follows a naming convention as shown below:
Facebook Ads Naming Convention - Campaign Name:
Camp|D_CampName#Market_Objective#TargetAge_TargetGender
Twitter Ads Naming Convention - Media Buy Name:
Market|TargetAge|Objective|OrderID
' Google Ads Naming Convention - Media Buy Name:
Buying Type_Market_Objective
The client wants to harmonize their data on the common fields between these two platforms (i.e. Market and Objective) using the Harmonization 'Center.
In addition to the previous details, the client provides the following data sample:


Logic specification:
If a value is not present in the Validation List, return "Not Valid"
If a value is not present in the Classification File, return "Unclassified".
If the Harmonization center is used to harmonize the above data and files, what table will show the final output?

A client created a new KPI: CPS (Cost per Sign-up).
The new KIP is mapped within the data stream mapping, and is populated with the following logic: (Media Cost) / Sign-ups) As can be seen in the table below, CPS was created twice and was set with two different aggregations:

From looking at the table, what are the aggregation settings for each one of the newly created KPIs?

A client's data consists of three data sources - Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads and Google Campaign Manager.
Notes:
* The client is planning on adding an additional 100 Facebook Ads data streams and 50 more LinkedIn Ads data streams.
* The final volume of data in the workspace will be 5M rows
* Each data source has a naming convention and it can be assumed that any additional profile (i.e. Data Stream) from one of these sources will follow the same naming convention.
The client provided the following sample files:
Facebook Ads:


The client would like to create a new harmonization field named "Market," which will only be coming from Facebook Ads and LinkedIn Ads. The logic for
"Market" is the following:
IF Media Buy Type is equal to "TypeB" or "TypeC" or "TypeD"
Return 'Europe'
ELSE
Return 'Rest Of The World'
In order to create the harmonization field Market, the client considers using either Mapping Formula, Calculated Dimension, VLOOKUP or Patterns.
Considering maintenance and scalability, which option is recommended?